From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: org-adapt-indentation default should be nil [legibility 3/6] Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 22:52:08 +0100 Message-ID: <87eev2xg8n.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87sgjqyg0l.fsf@alphapapa.net> <87wo8uapmk.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49430) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j1GyR-0006nu-Qb for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 16:52:13 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Samuel Wales's message of "Mon, 10 Feb 2020 13:33:59 -0700") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Samuel Wales Cc: Adam Porter , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Samuel, thanks for your feedback. Samuel Wales writes: > obviously, as a default not indenting text as you seem to propose is > good for newcomers. Perhaps, we will see! > as for org as it is now, with a mixture of at least 3 indentation > styles in the wild, idk. What I observed is that some users will turn M-x org-indent RET just to have planning lines displayed correctly (i.e. visually indented), while still willing to let the subtree text not indented at all. You can now have this without running org-indent, which I think is an improvement - we'll see. Best, -- Bastien