From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Survey: changing a few default settings for Org 9.4 Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 08:10:31 +0100 Message-ID: <87eeup7mzc.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87pnebf2ku.fsf@gnu.org> <87ftf5zyso.fsf@alphapapa.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34387) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j4fyt-0001wL-5A for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 02:10:43 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87ftf5zyso.fsf@alphapapa.net> (Adam Porter's message of "Wed, 19 Feb 2020 22:07:51 -0600") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Adam Porter Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Adam, Adam Porter writes: > I generally approve of all of these changes. Thanks for sharing your opinion. > However, hiding emphasis and macro markers can make editing text at > the boundaries of emphasized text non-intuitive, which I can imagine > might frustrate some new users, so that should probably be carefully > considered. Interestingly, hiding emphasis and macro markers are the two changes that get the *less* votes, so we probably won't change these. Best, -- Bastien