From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id mKJAKnEuTmN1CAEAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 06:41:21 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id kIRhKnEuTmNC8QAA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 06:41:21 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5056B99A4 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 06:41:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:59446 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1okePo-0002i0-DJ for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 00:41:20 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60226) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1okePD-0002h9-9f for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 00:40:43 -0400 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:52375) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1okeOx-00027p-0n for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 00:40:42 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB18D240101 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 06:40:24 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1666068024; bh=ZDCEz8dmIO9aQpePhMrrUh3FF/AYpJGFY9rroCJWF9A=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=OrOK7azuViXg48OzcsicGu+qE+adYqmZnRZik89cYkbqhKEMKZKPGo4NwPm6QYsoY hKRDKRd7qxTbTf6frnYJINdp4PJfrURimuE82bavU0i5i6lxW3NomcDZ2JKYlVDcXq Mp8Xj5GjcGWek7Dw5R8bQCs9wrvf5wSjO+oHGbTELV88GrOdKDx/K0Jsm4kHlUr1GY 6uySgS7zyRKxMzvhqo8GKDg0xPRYat6BmHzdOne0F6Wl7ER40BNu3m0zdRnidAdNwZ sMeOfSpbTK95DW2TsKtmKsNqDpYGC2C3QONZkCguoiwAp+nLSVr63cGgdbQ/LK3RWp 7PBDSyEYPjolg== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4Ms1Pd6NsJz6tnG; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 06:40:21 +0200 (CEST) From: Ihor Radchenko To: Juan Manuel =?utf-8?Q?Mac=C3=ADas?= , Daniel Fleischer Cc: Max Nikulin , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Ihor Radchenko , Vikas Rawal Subject: Re: Line breaks and brackets in LaTeX export In-Reply-To: <874jw2conh.fsf@posteo.net> References: <875ygk6a8z.fsf@posteo.net> <87a65vitbz.fsf_-_@posteo.net> <87edv6izx4.fsf@localhost> <8735bmelgu.fsf@posteo.net> <878rlecx49.fsf@posteo.net> <874jw2conh.fsf@posteo.net> Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 04:41:08 +0000 Message-ID: <87edv5hhgb.fsf@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1666068081; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=ZDCEz8dmIO9aQpePhMrrUh3FF/AYpJGFY9rroCJWF9A=; b=XZC1uEDrxsnFcRSFJW9hfmP5smqbElgclkO9TfufRPDa/wJS7rXa+dylWoGpn1UgHBNwCI FYz3M0fP8lYS+CdhkYTIJglIPBW/9Unch9c5TTKhnZOIi3oxlkCp5UMi2tS7ryjT0GmOPO D2UhPE0rJTQHSXOpAweo+PidosJCIm86AC5qekFtVfTFuJRCiec1O8AxRHuoQCW+qBBkw4 6gUoiQUX+wwv4myI+kfe3f9U7ApfV8+Z50nznLGK7kEKMD6K23sX4N0CwHZrd3hqJhPEam zs2JVEtVi0KfJ5z66JESEe4VCYuTOPQ4gITmIKcozLDWnaDeBN3mw3IuYFnTEw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1666068081; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=QoG0P0Bx5b4/ND3ZKDq+LybZhkTgbyiVbD7CQSobF4QxahLGQ3k42AfqVkq67o9tHv5a12 yCJdblG1phsD2MQrynFKHJzsAuzM14+OHuTLQyhxpzDytR9R2/9fFz815f5SXVicb1bdbc 3pg15kxZeknUDOH9LOwMZFjFvOLpOnJMQOUu5Epu/hexWYL7ByrVB2/8BVhyFSpSmMUsvz mok75iPYdbnpkfxJ70XvTYxtdqfIN5iUusOIOYI1rxMcyA2XsQxwPh2tx2L5sfh/DrCzEX DLtSL56UdgwTWLVGt6vmENOFAPat0Lwc++2nWbBL48aiWCDmq8dqXE1RXXWfLA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=OrOK7azu; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.42 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=OrOK7azu; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 5056B99A4 X-Spam-Score: -3.42 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: Xtf9pNSOE/XZ Juan Manuel Mac=C3=ADas writes: > Assuming that there is currently no alternative to the non-selective > solution, and that, as you say, the presence of brackets may be more > common than I initially expected, if I had to choose between \empty and > [0pt], I would say that [0pt] is the safest, as it is an expected > argument to \\ and equals the default space. I can't think of any > unexpected results from this, but of course, it also depends on there > being no package redefining \\ with another argument structure on its > own. I think it would be a bad idea for a package developer, but LaTeX > (and the LaTeX packages) is horribly unpredictable. It is easy to change \\\empty constant to \\[0pt] if necessary. I have no objection either way. Though I do not feel like we are in rush. I'd like to hear from ox-latex maintainer. --=20 Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at