From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp10.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id iJl9H1E90WMxYAEAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 15:31:45 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp10.migadu.com with LMTPS id iPpeHlE90WOPWgAAG6o9tA (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 15:31:45 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0812138754 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 15:31:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pKgnc-0002rV-Mo; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 09:30:52 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pKgnZ-0002qp-On for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 09:30:49 -0500 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pKgnX-0007LS-Hx for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 09:30:49 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A43B2405B2 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 15:30:42 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1674657043; bh=zX9OFgJiEh6TRcCQvCm5uXla++Dna3FoNvvDVA4X6Pc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=Ay8ir4sNyyPa/g4dHyE2nLjnos2GG/xW0pJhoLq8MQEsn5lN+A1/Y7Xpa0sk6UDCI bQjAH9YlR21wJMoIgpy/WoPlI7bqPgvI4M4RznpZU/JGHYLQZ+siF9198hz1CAIuJy 9Hp8HQVA8AWU7Nt10tEN7m7PyV12/9ihR13a+lJD2XaXEh4QRMmuEunopjrfnueQ5x pCaiLj7Ux1Fx2NVWZU8Rzsm+kU2co/s8xarjM6nJQY1dgcavp76RXoCLsOlg3Bvh1S ossASXrUZZEsfgXNHvKu5oBXjCQd9V5lKSzkTFqU/Y9DuKl40Cw/TAK43lfymPQMxW iFIrnqNOV1ffA== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4P25q53Z3mz9rxK; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 15:30:41 +0100 (CET) From: Ihor Radchenko To: Tim Cross Cc: rms@gnu.org, Jean Louis , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Subject: Re: Supporting non-free SQL clients in ob-sql (was: [PATCH] ob-sql: Add support for Athena) In-Reply-To: <63d13a47.170a0220.e629f.6974@mx.google.com> References: <874jsqbvfq.fsf@kraus.my> <87358an35i.fsf@localhost> <63c5b8db.170a0220.e466f.2573@mx.google.com> <87o7qxmr6y.fsf@kraus.my> <87fsc9iifs.fsf@localhost> <63d0e433.170a0220.54a51.4c8f@mx.google.com> <87a626n64x.fsf@localhost> <63d13a47.170a0220.e629f.6974@mx.google.com> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 14:31:09 +0000 Message-ID: <87edrilm8i.fsf@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1674657105; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=f0wQNtuB+4DkATmJ2Y2Fk4hl9ZFwMOaTF2r7ShodYeE=; b=obGbAoHz6eEm+l+g4ZDv12D4646HZKMiQD5eZXIVb+vyhYwPeW4zRRTmrlvq6YEki4upjs JyDi38TMCydwCzIcK/ItxkyP4Q5jBXNOSBWBoE8x5/SaQBJCPdO1cHJZV7vwk9QV6wRrED FnWzzzoI/ECrKM/dOoqy2kd15DYmBDhEUjKVYUldcJ+3giJsOrRINDIWEmyVmHXmQmeScw 80b4xiLeWcWw25ia7uqNpJwrKmhad68Gnc/viUilD13JbU2iDsXoyTp7zD6rLWJAZNnV1D zo71Ke9AeGOYO7eF6k+uL28aO53dpRUvD66j5imY6HfSGFiRYqbRG364KApQ2A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=Ay8ir4sN; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1674657105; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=CvCZS41BzUB7AgrOmOMxcETzNWIWsV6p3Qnd8VDbbi7EZtW2uqZxKFvEM2kV6WZKkkEQhB B2Zuv29VSFYRMNf6yGqR0tk/krdzGaofW4ZXVJdb/QuCSExZbzHVYZylIaC+s3xeMrvpqU pusiFfpYqnCwLRfLa7uQ8pKVaBeMvfM5HgcBu7hKykS2gTFoRXVyJqO20Z2cxReftZbX2a rgWvNkzZi2AUwztzNxyg38krqwnpcNB+td4R7AdGFVk+Lk168EfKtR/GHW8xK+5qaY7f9z GHbGwuZlXdFWXi77I9yqsQ7cxRMv9/aYDhB4rz+eA+WakEYJapwvO4Nadbg8mg== X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=Ay8ir4sN; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -6.04 X-Spam-Score: -6.04 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 0812138754 X-TUID: aXixZJuUyVOn Tim Cross writes: > 3. There is no requirement to install non-free software to use > ob-sql.el. The software is fully functional using a free RDMS like > postgres. Yes, but there is requirement to install in order to use ob-sql.el __with :engine set to non-free option__. So, I can envision that someone who decided to use ob-sql.el and considering between free and non-free engine may prefer non-free one. Of course, it is not very strong argument, but the boundaries are fuzzy in this area. > For maintenance reasons and to add session support, I would suggest that > using sql.el instead of re-inventing this wheel would be a better > outcome. I've used sql.el for years and it works extremely well and I > don't htink it would be too hard to integrate into ob-sql. Sure. That's what we usually do - just use whatever REPL is available for a given ob-* language. Just a question of someone sending a patch. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at