From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [Bug] Level 2 text not exported in LaTeX (well in HTML) + some comments Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 11:24:09 +0200 Message-ID: <87d3saozly.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com> References: <87ocdzw7gq.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com> <43BA920D-4EA2-4C51-B941-33A60D097EB3@gmail.com> <87hbi6uprt.fsf@fastmail.fm> <87y6bhajrm.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com> <87wrr1aexq.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com> <448D9DB2-71DE-4B9B-BF5B-B575735D794D@yahoo.com> <878w3dlbqy.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com> <87hbhomsl5.fsf_-_@mundaneum.com> <8762y4jsm0.wl%ucecesf@ucl.ac.uk> <87eicrorpr.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com> <87fwx6hg5q.wl%ucecesf@ucl.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=55568 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OxG8N-00061Z-69 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 05:24:32 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OxG8L-0002hO-WE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 05:24:31 -0400 Received: from mail-ww0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:39092) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OxG8L-0002h6-R1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 05:24:29 -0400 Received: by wwb24 with SMTP id 24so4218786wwb.30 for ; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 02:24:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87fwx6hg5q.wl%ucecesf@ucl.ac.uk> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Eric S Fraga Cc: =?UTF-8?B?U8OpYmFzdGllbg==?= Vauban , Eric S Fraga , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org >>>>> Eric S Fraga writes: > So you are saying, if I understand you correctly, that you cannot > have something like this: > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > 1. some text > - a nested list > - with two items > some more text for the first numbered item > - another nested list - with two items > 2. the second outer list item > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Exactly. > If so, why not? This would seem to be quite a likely and useful > scenario. It would require a slightly different model with an added depth of complexity. To tell the truth, I had looked into this, but hadn't found a satisfying (clean) solution. For example, how should Org handle indentation of such a line, or any line within the list? Should it "round" the indentation to the closest level of a sub-list? And if you add a new line, should the user insert spaces to reach the desired level of sub-list, or should Org TAB-cycle indentation through every level of the list? Wouldn't this be painful on deeply nested lists? If the list is so long that you can't display it's first items, what happens when you want to end the 4th of 6 sub-lists? Could you remember what proper indentation is needed? Those questions are more rhetorical than anything else. My point is just that this kind of scenario, while certainly doable, would need more thought, and much more work to implement. Is it _that_ useful? > I do this all the time in latex and I was sure that I had done this > before in org. Is my recollection wrong? Was this not possible > before? As far as I remember, LaTeX exporter has never been able to parse this, though the HTML one did. Note that a TAB on your line of text was (i.e. in the latest stable release) indenting it past the second nested list item. That signifies even Org wasn't understanding properly the meaning of your list. Regards, -- Nicolas