From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christopher Allan Webber Subject: Occurance property, or some similar name? Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 17:42:28 -0500 Message-ID: <87d3ksqujv.fsf@dustycloud.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:56844) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q9SPS-0003QD-Vy for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 21:28:54 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q9PoH-0004Ms-7t for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 18:42:18 -0400 Received: from li28-75.members.linode.com ([75.127.72.75]:48626) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q9PoH-0004Mi-5R for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 18:42:17 -0400 Received: from grumps (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by li28-75.members.linode.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C166AC911 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 22:42:15 +0000 (UTC) List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org I was once one of the many people who apparently originally misunderstood what "SCHEDULED" meant, and used to set it to like, an appointment time. It seems the appropriate thing for what I actually meant was to just put a timestamp anywhere in the entry and that works out well. A lot of people put it on the header apparently, and that seems insane to me. I kind of miss how nice it was back when I misunderstood how events work (escept for all of those non-TODOs staying around forever on my agenda..) where I had a dedicated property for this, and pressing C-c C-s would always change that property. What I'm saying I guess is: - Is there a popular property name for when something should be happening, in a non-TODO way? I've thought of "OCCURANCE" but maybe that isn't the best (I suspect not) - Maybe if we formalize this property, we should make a command for it? Maybe C-c C-S-o? - It would be nice to formalize this so we could actually steer people in the right direction in the docs. --=20 =F0=9D=93=92=F0=9D=93=B1=F0=9D=93=BB=F0=9D=93=B2=F0=9D=93=BC=F0=9D=93=BD=F0= =9D=93=B8=F0=9D=93=B9=F0=9D=93=B1=F0=9D=93=AE=F0=9D=93=BB =F0=9D=93=90=F0= =9D=93=B5=F0=9D=93=B5=F0=9D=93=AA=F0=9D=93=B7 =F0=9D=93=A6=F0=9D=93=AE=F0= =9D=93=AB=F0=9D=93=AB=F0=9D=93=AE=F0=9D=93=BB