From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Myles English Subject: Re: [odt] equation labels Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 14:49:43 +0000 Message-ID: <87d3dasho8.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87y5w5aoyx.fsf@gmail.com> <81ipn6f7uh.fsf@gmail.com> <8739e9nzpg.fsf@gmail.com> <818vnz639e.fsf@gmail.com> <87ipn2slwm.fsf@gmail.com> <21285.1320241100@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> Reply-To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:42589) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RLc6X-0006uO-9s for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 10:47:54 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RLc6W-0001zM-30 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 10:47:49 -0400 Received: from mail-ww0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:43506) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RLc6V-0001zB-KT for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 10:47:48 -0400 Received: by wwe3 with SMTP id 3so274116wwe.30 for ; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 07:47:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <21285.1320241100@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> (Nick Dokos's message of "Wed, 02 Nov 2011 09:38:20 -0400") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode Nick, >> On Wed, 02 Nov 2011 09:38:20 -0400, Nick Dokos said: > Myles English wrote: >> >> There is (git from a couple of days ago) a problem with referring >> to equations containing an underscore in the label, I am fairly >> sure it was allowed before, e.g.: >> >> #+LABEL: Equation:new_eq \begin{equation} x=\sqrt{b} \end{equation} >> >> Referring to an equation with an underscore: \ref{Equation:new_eq} >> >> I get a libreoffice popup: >> >> "Read Error. Format error discovered in the file in sub-document >> content.xmlat 2236,92(row,col)." >> > I can reproduce that and it may be a consequence of a change that I > introduced at the top level export engine about six months ago. Let > me take a look. > Nick I may be mistaken but I think it became broken more recently, circa 7th Oct. Myles