From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Abrahamsen Subject: Re: using local.mk to maintain a local git branch Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 11:05:45 +0800 Message-ID: <87d2yy2zqu.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <87mwy5qfia.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87mwy4fnj6.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <8738zu4uzh.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44815) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TdXuQ-0003Gc-Ec for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 22:02:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TdXuM-0002C8-6Z for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 22:01:58 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:55249) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TdXuM-0002C0-0I for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 22:01:54 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TdXuU-0002g6-Kb for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 04:02:02 +0100 Received: from 114.250.110.27 ([114.250.110.27]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 04:02:02 +0100 Received: from eric by 114.250.110.27 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 04:02:02 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Achim Gratz writes: > Eric Abrahamsen writes: >> Probably nothing -- the FAQ gave me the impression that it was somehow >> preferable to use the make system rather than git config to keep a local >> git branch rebased to master; I didn't realize the note in the FAQ was >> addressing changes to the Makefile in particular. > > I've changed the FAQ to hopefully avoid that impression. Let me know if > it needs further improvement. Perfect! Thanks.