From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Leha Subject: Re: Syntax of Org Babel ":results" header argument Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 09:27:25 +0100 Message-ID: <87d2uxaz9u.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> References: <86li9v1nb0.fsf@somewhere.org> <86mwu59eev.fsf@somewhere.org> <87obei1l7w.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87li9l3e8i.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47180) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UHVQ0-000568-Ph for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 04:27:48 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UHVPz-0004MR-E5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 04:27:44 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:40820) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UHVPz-0004MI-7f for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 04:27:43 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UHVQI-0001wV-U1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 09:28:02 +0100 Received: from genepi110.genepi.med.uni-goettingen.de ([134.76.140.110]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 09:28:02 +0100 Received: from andreas.leha by genepi110.genepi.med.uni-goettingen.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 09:28:02 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org tsd@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes: > Eric Schulte writes: > >> Bastien writes: >> >>> Hi Sébastien, >>> >>> "Sebastien Vauban" >>> writes: >>> >>>> As there was no reaction to this, I'd like to bump it up. At least, to either >>>> have a discussion on this, or a clearly stated "no go". >>> >>> I tend to agree with Jay here and I prefer the minimalist syntax, >>> although values for the :results parameter are heterogeneous. >>> >> >> +1 for maintaining the existing concise syntax. > > +1 for stable syntax. > +1 one more vote Andreas