From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [ox-latex] Bad default value for image width?
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 22:13:38 +0200
Message-ID: <87d2u2400d.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <87haji85a7.fsf@pank.iue.private> <8761zv9xd0.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87y5cqiown.fsf@pank.iue.private> <87k3oasic2.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87ppy2i9kt.fsf@pank.iue.private>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55110)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1UQ1Ow-0008Qq-7n
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 16:13:51 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1UQ1Ou-0002yg-Qm
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 16:13:50 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87ppy2i9kt.fsf@pank.iue.private> (rasmus@gmx.us's message of
	"Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:23:14 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us>
Cc: Bastien Guerry <bzg@gnu.org>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us> writes:

> Perhaps.  I'm not convinced.

Since I didn't introduce this feature in new exporter (it was already in
the previous one), it may be interesting to know the motivation of the
person who originally introduced it. I think it was Bastien (Cc'ed).

> If the float width is removed I can change the default and never be
> affected by these design choices and it's all good.

Done.

> For people who use it it might also be reasonable to introduce
> a org-latex-wrap-image-default-width or making
> org-latex-image-default-width a list ordered by type of element/float
> type.
>
> E.g. '((float . ".9\\textwidth") (wrap . ".5\\textwidth")). . . 

I'm not sure we need to go that far.

> I'll check it out and report back.  I can't access git from this
> network (high port numbers are blocked for "security" reasons) so I'll
> only try it out later.

Thank you.


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou