From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: different achiving mode
Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2014 15:47:52 +0100
Message-ID: <87d2k7st0n.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
References: <uaxli0coqbw.fsf@beesknees.cern.ch>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58717)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1VzSWA-00066n-Ss
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jan 2014 09:48:08 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1VzSW5-0004BJ-2v
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jan 2014 09:48:02 -0500
Received: from mail-we0-x231.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::231]:63608)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1VzSW4-0004BF-S4
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jan 2014 09:47:57 -0500
Received: by mail-we0-f177.google.com with SMTP id u56so14483902wes.36
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sat, 04 Jan 2014 06:47:55 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <uaxli0coqbw.fsf@beesknees.cern.ch> (David Belohrad's message of
	"Mon, 25 Nov 2013 09:09:23 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: David Belohrad <david@belohrad.ch>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi David,

David Belohrad <david@belohrad.ch> writes:

> for a certain time I'm using ordinary archiving. I.e. moving DONE marked
> tags to archive file. For this I'm using
>
> (org-advertized-archive-subtree &optional FIND-DONE)
>
> with shortcut C-u C-c C-x C-s, hence it will find all DONE items and
> move them to archive.
>
> I have a trouble with 'how' the items are moved. If I look into archive,
> the hiearchy is 'flattened'. What I'd like to see there is the same
> hierarchy as I have in the original file, the same tags, but with
> ARCHIVE tag added (eventually having entire file marked with ARCHIVE
> tag).

Mhh... I don't see how we could not flatten the hierarchy in some
circumstances.

For example:

* TODO Headline
** DONE Task

If you want to archive the DONE Task to another file, you cannot 
archive the TODO Headline with it.

Or maybe I didn't understand your use-case correctly.

Best,

-- 
 Bastien