From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: bug#19014: 25.0.50; Disable Org, Tbl, & Text menu items that change buffer when read-only Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 11:43:45 +0100 Message-ID: <87d28k7pr2.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34756) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqgGW-0002XM-Dq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 05:44:14 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqgGQ-0006nX-QH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 05:44:08 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39623) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqgGQ-0006nT-Mz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 05:44:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XqgGQ-0007ia-EW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 05:44:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Mon, 10 Nov 2014 14:13:08 -0800 (PST)") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Drew Adams Cc: 19014@debbugs.gnu.org Hi Drew, Drew Adams writes: > There are lots of menu items in the Org menu-bar menus (Org, Tbl, Text) > that modify the buffer but are not disabled when the buffer is > read-only. They should be - they are no-ops in this context. > > This is all the more important because there are still plenty of menu > items for commands that are useful in a read-only buffer. Disabling the > others makes those that are available more obvious and easier to select. Do you often turn read-only on on Org buffers? In what circumstances would users turn read-only on in Org buffers? > That is what we do for the Edit menu, for example. You can use it as a > model, here. I understand the suggestion, I'm trying to see if this is important or not. Thanks in advance for your feedback. -- Bastien