From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Why not push? Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 11:38:52 +0100 Message-ID: <87d25bo3wj.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87h9unwk0r.fsf@wmi.amu.edu.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32853) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YMwaC-0005jG-P1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 05:37:53 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YMwa8-0005BK-3W for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 05:37:48 -0500 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::196]:44667) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YMwa7-0005BG-UZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 05:37:44 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87h9unwk0r.fsf@wmi.amu.edu.pl> (Marcin Borkowski's message of "Sun, 15 Feb 2015 11:23:32 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Marcin Borkowski Cc: Org-Mode mailing list Hello, Marcin Borkowski writes: > I don't want to be nitpicking, but I'm just curious. I'm looking at the > function `org-split-string'. It uses (two times) the following > construction: > > (setq list (cons (something) list)) > > Is there any particular reason for not using `push' there? No. Good luck with refactoring "org.el". ;) Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou