From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Citation syntax: a revised proposal Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 23:45:23 +0100 Message-ID: <87d24rauik.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87k2zjnc0e.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87zj8co3se.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87ioezooi2.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87mw4bpaiu.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <8761aznpiq.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87twyjnh0r.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87oaopx24e.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87k2zd4f3w.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87egpkv8g9.fsf@berkeley.edu> <877fv6xfaq.fsf@gmail.com> <87twya2ak0.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87zj81aa97.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87ioep2r6p.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87y4ngbgm7.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87twy39qt2.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87pp8rb1i3.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87bnkbrver.fsf@gmx.us> <87h9u3avtu.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87twy3qbbj.fsf@gmx.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45991) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YSZ4T-00013t-JI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 17:44:18 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YSZ4Q-0006fU-En for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 17:44:17 -0500 Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::198]:53782) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YSZ4Q-0006fK-81 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 17:44:14 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87twy3qbbj.fsf@gmx.us> (rasmus@gmx.us's message of "Mon, 02 Mar 2015 23:33:20 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Rasmus Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Rasmus writes: > Perhaps the difference is too subtle. Note that you would never deal with > a `citation' other than through a mapping. Hmm. I still find `citations/citation' pair confusing. What about `citation/part'? > Right, I was trying *to add* support for [@k1; =E2=8B=AF;@kN]. Please don't. Let's keep shortcuts simple. > I was talking about paring [cite: pre @k post] as=20 > > > (citation (:begin n :end N > :cites > '((cite (:key key :begin n1 :end N1 :prefix pre :suffix p= ost))))) > > And not: > > (citation (:begin n :end N :prefix pre :suffix post > :cites '((cite (:key key :begin n1 :end N1))))) > > Perhaps I'm worrying about things that need not be worried about. The latter would be obtained with [cite: pre; @k; post] Regards,