From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Aaron Ecay <aaronecay@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Multiple (identical) RESULTS blocks of one code block?
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 23:05:38 -0300
Message-ID: <87d24hmx2i.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <m2h9tutrkb.fsf@krugs.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32854)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <aaronecay@gmail.com>) id 1YV9YV-0002zv-Vr
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 22:06:01 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <aaronecay@gmail.com>) id 1YV9YS-0004qd-QE
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 22:05:59 -0400
Received: from mail-qg0-x229.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c04::229]:35857)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <aaronecay@gmail.com>) id 1YV9YS-0004qV-Kx
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 22:05:56 -0400
Received: by qgdz107 with SMTP id z107so33388800qgd.3
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 19:05:56 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <m2h9tutrkb.fsf@krugs.de>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Rainer M Krug <Rainer@krugs.de>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi Rainer,

2015ko martxoak 9an, Rainer M Krug-ek idatzi zuen:
>
> Hi
>
> Consider the following:
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> * The calculation
> #+NAME: testcode :exports both

It looks like you=E2=80=99ve tried to put a header argument into the name. =
 Is
it merely an accident?  I ask because...

> #+begin_src R  :session test
> runif(10)
> #+end_src
>
>
> * summary of the results
> First time
> #+RESULTS: testcode :exports both
> |  0.772744940361008 |
> |  0.170518629485741 |
> | 0.0833237133920193 |
> |  0.149035625392571 |
> |  0.698798568220809 |
> |  0.627075897762552 |
> |  0.177144371205941 |
> | 0.0476319056469947 |
> |  0.289851602632552 |
> | 0.0296813279855996 |
>
> * and another
> testthingy
> #+RESULTS: testcode :exports both

...here it reoccurs, in identical format.  This is fine, interpreted
as just a weird block name (and not as an actual header argument).
But if you=E2=80=99re trying to allow the header arguments to vary for the =
two
result blocks I don=E2=80=99t think it will be very nice.  (It would require
re-evaluating the code block for each different combination of header
arguments, which would give unexpected behavior in the case of side
effects, etc. etc.)

Maybe it=E2=80=99s not very important, but I just figured I=E2=80=99d ask f=
or
clarification.

Thanks,

--
Aaron Ecay