From: Marcin Borkowski <mbork@mbork.pl>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Org-mode exporters licensing
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 19:42:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d1zdv6o2.fsf@mbork.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55B62153.4070904@grinta.net>
On 2015-07-27, at 14:17, Daniele Nicolodi <daniele@grinta.net> wrote:
> On 27/07/15 13:52, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
>> I disagree. Licensing a tutorial with GPL is a stupid thing to do.
>> A tutorial may contain code which people naturally mimic (or even
>> copy). Such things should definitely be in PD.
>
> As yourself pointed out in one of your emails, in many legal
> ordinations, there is no such concept as public domain: you cannot
> renounce to the copyright on your intellectual production.
That I've already learned. OTOH, one of the reasons to use PD might be
that I explicitly state that I object the legal system I live in. (Mind
you: I'm not an anarchist, and I'm very far from that. But this system
is almost unbearable.)
> Therefore licensing something as public domain is not quite possible. If
> you want to grant the users of your code the most freedom (but do not
> care about this freedom being carried over to others) the 3-Clause BSD
> license http://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-3-Clause, the 2-Clause BSD
> license http://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-2-Clause, or the MIT license
> http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html are good candidate
> licenses formulated in the framework of copyright law as accepted
> internationally.
Thanks for the suggestions!
> However, you cannot derive your work from some other work distributed
> under GPL and license it with a more permissive license (as the ones
> suggested above). What constituted a derived work is however not
> scientifically defined (and you have been rather terse in describing how
> your work build upon code released under the GPLv3). In one place you
> explicitly mention running a query-replace on the source code:
> mechanical transformations of the source code are considered derived
> works, even if the end result does not resemble at all the original.
I agree that I was probably too concise. In another post I included an
explicit example of what kind of "transformations" (mechanical or
otherwise) I had in mind. I still personally find hard to believe that
what I have in mind would consitute "derived work".
> I would suggest you to do derive your work from the GPL code and then
> consult with the authors about its licensing. If you are only using the
> GPL code as a skeleton, I think they would not have objections (but you
> could also easily re-implement it from scratch).
This seems wise. I'm not sure whether I would re-implement it "easily",
especially that I see no point in deliberately not looking at existing
code. (Besides, I saw it anyway, and I can't unsee it;-).)
> Other than this I would recommend you to refrain from harsh comments on
> a matter on which you hold strong ideas but weak knowledge (as most of
> this thread demonstrates). Especially if your positions seem detrimental
> of the Copyleft model, and you are asking for help in a mailing-list
> devoted to a very successful Copyleft program.
Well, as I mentioned earlier, my knowledge is less and less weak, also
thanks to your explanations. OTOH, the more I know about these issues,
the more I dislike the status quo, and the more harsh my opinions about
GPL in particular are. (It is not a secret that I am very critical of
the GPL and of the FSF. Still, as I said before, I'm very hesitant
about explicitly breaking their rules.)
> Cheers,
> Daniele
Thanks again,
--
Marcin Borkowski
http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski
Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science
Adam Mickiewicz University
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-27 17:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-27 8:06 Org-mode exporters licensing Marcin Borkowski
2015-07-27 8:16 ` Rasmus
2015-07-27 8:26 ` Marcin Borkowski
2015-07-27 8:35 ` Rasmus
2015-07-27 9:05 ` Marcin Borkowski
2015-07-27 9:46 ` Eric S Fraga
2015-07-27 11:50 ` Marcin Borkowski
2015-07-27 8:42 ` Eric S Fraga
2015-07-27 8:59 ` Marcin Borkowski
2015-07-27 9:31 ` Eric S Fraga
2015-07-27 11:52 ` Marcin Borkowski
2015-07-27 12:17 ` Daniele Nicolodi
2015-07-27 12:42 ` Greg Troxel
2015-07-27 12:52 ` Daniele Nicolodi
2015-07-27 17:45 ` Marcin Borkowski
2015-08-02 16:54 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2015-07-27 17:44 ` Marcin Borkowski
2015-07-27 17:42 ` Marcin Borkowski [this message]
2015-07-27 18:02 ` Daniele Nicolodi
2015-07-27 18:20 ` Marcin Borkowski
2015-07-27 18:30 ` Daniele Nicolodi
2015-07-27 18:49 ` Marcin Borkowski
2015-07-28 7:05 ` Robert Klein
2015-07-27 12:06 ` Oleh Krehel
2015-07-27 12:27 ` Rasmus
2015-07-27 12:25 ` Oleh Krehel
2015-07-27 12:50 ` Daniele Nicolodi
2015-07-27 17:47 ` Marcin Borkowski
2015-07-27 17:10 ` Achim Gratz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87d1zdv6o2.fsf@mbork.pl \
--to=mbork@mbork.pl \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).