From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: org-entry-delete vs org-entry-put
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 14:31:46 +0100
Message-ID: <87d1ffb4ql.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <87o9z03ej0.fsf@luisa.c0t0d0s0.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54700)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1cVIFL-0002fc-1Q
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Jan 2017 08:31:51 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1cVIFK-0006oT-AX
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Jan 2017 08:31:51 -0500
Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::195]:57680)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>)
	id 1cVIFK-0006oJ-4s
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Jan 2017 08:31:50 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87o9z03ej0.fsf@luisa.c0t0d0s0.de> (Michael Welle's message of
	"Sat, 21 Jan 2017 11:15:15 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Michael Welle <mwe012008@gmx.net>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

Michael Welle <mwe012008@gmx.net> writes:

> 1. Property names like DISABLED-SCHEDULED seem to be problematic. I
>    guess the regexp matching the scheduled property is too greedy.

What exactly is problematic? Could you expound a bit?

> 2. (org-entry-put pom "SCHEDULED" nil) removes the property, but
>    (org-entry-delete pom "SCHEDULED")  doesn't.

Fixed: `org-entry-delete' now deletes wrong "SCHEDULED" property. Thank
you.

>    On the other hand,   
>    (org-entry-put pom "foo" nil) doesn't remove the property, but
>    (org-entry-delete pom "foo")  does.

I don't see any problem here given the docstring of `org-entry-put'.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou