From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Sort error [9.0.9 (9.0.9-88-g251f88-elpa @ /home/someone/.emacs.d/elpa/org-20170821/)] Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 00:16:16 +0200 Message-ID: <87d17eqatr.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42826) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dmonz-0005Rk-QL for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Aug 2017 18:16:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dmony-0000gu-W0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Aug 2017 18:16:19 -0400 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::196]:51121) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dmony-0000fy-Pw for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Aug 2017 18:16:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Allen Choong's message of "Mon, 28 Aug 2017 08:15:13 +0000") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Allen Choong Cc: "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" Hello, Allen Choong writes: > Expect to sort the items according to "todo order" which has no issue pre= viously. But now it fails. Not only "todo order" but also "alpha", "numeric= ", and so on, except "clocking". > > > With a file contains this, > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > * test > ** TODO test2 > ** DONE test3 > CLOSED: [2017-08-28 Mon 15:51] > ** test4 > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > I put my cursor at "*test", and do a "C-c ^" (org-sort), then type "o" (t= odo(o)rder), but is shows > > > ``` > > org-sort-entries: Symbol=E2=80=99s function definition is void: org-clock= ing-buffer > > ``` > > > However, if I do the sorting with "clocking" first, then all the other > sort will work fine, until I restart the emacs. Fixed. Thank you. Regards, --=20 Nicolas Goaziou