From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric S Fraga Subject: Re: Problems created by inlinetasks in agenda views Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 15:01:53 +0100 Message-ID: <87d0yzfdwu.fsf@gmail.com> References: <23248.48530.817172.917300@frac.u-strasbg.fr> <87in8ricbd.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39778) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f84hs-00087b-Fk for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:02:14 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f84ho-0003EO-Iy for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:02:08 -0400 Received: from mail-wr0-x233.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c0c::233]:34846) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f84ho-00039r-C1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:02:04 -0400 Received: by mail-wr0-x233.google.com with SMTP id w3so9739567wrg.2 for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 07:02:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87in8ricbd.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Mon, 16 Apr 2018 14:08:06 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Alain.Cochard@unistra.fr --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Monday, 16 Apr 2018 at 14:08, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: [...] > However, since inline tasks have been around for years, it may be a good > time to decide once and for all how, and if, they should be included in > Org proper.=20 Hi Nicolas, I use inlinetasks all the time and for a number of different use cases. My initial reaction is that I would not like to see them disappear! I do agree that their implementation would appear to be a little clunky and maybe other solutions or implementations would be possible. So, you have motivated me to look at alternatives just in case. I've started playing with the export settings for drawers for odt and LaTeX. It does seem like I can move to using drawers instead of inline tasks for all of my uses *except* for actual tasks. It would nice to have some improved navigation and search facilities for drawers which, knowing org, probably already exist? Tagging would also be useful but probably difficult and maybe not reasonable given that drawers have names anyway. It would also be useful to be able to narrow a view to the drawer contents. thanks, eric =2D-=20 Eric S Fraga via Emacs 27.0.50, Org release_9.1.6-419-g52ba1a --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EARECAB0WIQSPXCedOQfhSlwpVw3IkZPY//z2fQUCWtSs0QAKCRDIkZPY//z2 fWHiAJ4ys9uL0kFyMEHYplGBq14HWwBBvQCfcpXOSspUhGq7pQMuirAR0dhq498= =YTRU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--