From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Bug: Docstrings of =org-agenda-todo-ignore-with-date= and =org-agenda-todo-ignore-timestamp= unclear [9.2 (release_9.2-215-g5b39d8 @ /home/mbork/others-works/emacs/org-mode/lisp/)] Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 21:19:44 +0200 Message-ID: <87d0j9pelr.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87k1dj2xiq.fsf@mbork.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48324) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hdg7c-0007o0-02 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 15:19:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hdg7a-0004iz-HG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 15:19:51 -0400 Received: from relay8-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.201]:60431) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hdg7a-0004gy-AH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 15:19:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87k1dj2xiq.fsf@mbork.pl> (Marcin Borkowski's message of "Tue, 18 Jun 2019 08:55:09 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Marcin Borkowski Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Marcin Borkowski writes: > The docstrings of =org-agenda-todo-ignore-with-date= and > =org-agenda-todo-ignore-timestamp= do not really tell what these > settings are doing. They should (imho) emphasize that the former just > omits from the global todo list all entries with at least one active > timestamp (in the hedaline or the body), and the latter checks the first > active timestamp which is not SCHEDULED or DEADLINE and compares it to > today's date. > > It could also be mentioned in the manual. > > I have GNU papers for Emacs signed. If this is enough, I'd be happy to > submit a patch. If so, what would be better: to patch only the > docstrings or the docstrings and the manual. I would say the latter. Thank you. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou