From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Lechtenboerger Subject: Re: ox-html: add option to restore old src block behaviour? Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 18:42:56 +0100 Message-ID: <87d0ahdpzz.fsf@informationelle-selbstbestimmung-im-internet.de> References: <87sgjhqgit.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54291) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j2ezY-0002MH-QE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 12:43:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j2ezX-0000uz-Ow for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 12:43:04 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87sgjhqgit.fsf@gnu.org> (Bastien's message of "Tue, 11 Feb 2020 16:40:10 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Bastien Cc: Org Mode On 2020-02-11, at 16:40, Bastien wrote: > Matt Price writes: > >> However, at least one very common syntax highlighter, https:// >> highlinghtjs.org, expects just a single tag, as do other >> common CSS frameworks. These often leave odd borders or background >> color disruptions which somewhat distort the view of the code. >> There's also a funny conflict with `org-re-reveal`, which expects the >> old behaviour (see https://gitlab.com/oer/org-re-reveal/issues/27).=C2=A0 >> It would in principal be possible to fix these issues directly in >> CSS, but it might be much more practical to have an option -- a >> defvar or a file/headline-settable property -- that restores the old >> behaviour when desired.=C2=A0 If this would be welcome, I could do it. I >> know org already has a bewildering number of options,though,and the >> code change would be oddly a number of times as large as the >> substantive change of that commit, os thought I'd check first. > > Yes, an option makes sense here -- can you provide one that allows to > restore the old behavior (and avoid all those ... lines)? Hi Bastien, that issue has been resolved: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2019-10/msg00099.html Best wishes Jens