From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id SG+hAfuG31+4WQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 17:16:43 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id ALQDOfqG31+mYwAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 17:16:42 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A2709403A7 for ; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 17:16:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:33468 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kr2K0-0005T7-Nh for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 12:16:40 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54688) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kr2Ic-0005Sq-Kw for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 12:15:15 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:49397) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kr2Ic-0006F4-De; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 12:15:14 -0500 Received: from [37.167.79.36] (port=10683 helo=guerry) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kr2Ic-0000EI-1E; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 12:15:14 -0500 Received: by guerry (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DE9EC1A60D27; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 18:15:11 +0100 (CET) From: Bastien To: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: Bug: org-element does not recognize table.el tables [9.4 (release_9.4-53-g23f941 @ /home/nick/elisp/org-mode/lisp/)] Organization: GNU References: <87k0tgt9v3.fsf@pierrot.dokosmarshall.org> Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2020 18:15:11 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87k0tgt9v3.fsf@pierrot.dokosmarshall.org> (Nick Dokos's message of "Thu, 17 Dec 2020 16:12:48 -0500") Message-ID: <87czz4ielc.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.82 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 8A2709403A7 X-Spam-Score: -2.82 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: 1FiT3rL1TZKl Hi Nick, Nick Dokos writes: > Consider an Org mode file with a table.el table (which I made by > first constructing an Org mode table and then usind `C-c ~' to > convert it): Would it be so bad if org-mode decides to stop supporting table.el tables? I don't see the benefit of supporting both Org tables and tables.el tables, and it calls for confusion. What do you and everyone else think? -- Bastien