[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 541 bytes --] On 2/5/21 in this email list Carsten Dominik suggested removing the key binding C-c <SPC> for "org-table-blank-field". That got implemented for Org-9.5, but the Info file didn't get changed, so it still says: ‘C-c <SPC>’ (‘org-table-blank-field’) Blank the field at point. in node (org) Built-in Table Editor In my own usage of tables I use this key binding a lot, so I am going to figure how to restore it. I don't subscribe to this list, because it's too overwhelming. Alan Wehmann alan.wehmann@gmail.com [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1617 bytes --]
On 10/05/21 21:49:22 -0500, Alan Wehmann wrote: > On 2/5/21 in this email list Carsten Dominik suggested removing the > key binding C-c <SPC> for "org-table-blank-field". That got > implemented for Org-9.5, but the Info file didn't get changed, so it > still says: > > ‘C-c <SPC>’ (‘org-table-blank-field’) > Blank the field at point. > > in node (org) Built-in Table Editor Thank you for catching that. I've updated the manual in 6874af872. > In my own usage of tables I use this key binding a lot, so I am going > to figure how to restore it. Sorry about that. You can restore it on your end by putting something like this in your config: (define-key org-mode-map (kbd "C-c SPC") #'org-table-blank-field)
Hi all The change is not announced in ORG-NEWS. I think it should be in Version 9.4. Michael
Michael Brand writes: > The change is not announced in ORG-NEWS. I think it should be in Version 9.4. Right, I agree this change should have come with a NEWS entry, though 0c4e844c8 (Remove default binding for org-table-blank-field, 2021-04-28) is from the 9.5 release not 9.4. However, 9.5 is out, and my understanding is that released NEWS sections should not be substantially modified in most cases (<https://list.orgmode.org/87o8ez4sch.fsf@bzg.fr>). I'll leave it to the author of the original change and Bastien to decide if they want to make an exception in this case.
Kyle Meyer <kyle@kyleam.com> writes:
> Michael Brand writes:
>
>> The change is not announced in ORG-NEWS. I think it should be in Version 9.4.
>
> Right, I agree this change should have come with a NEWS entry, though
> 0c4e844c8 (Remove default binding for org-table-blank-field, 2021-04-28)
> is from the 9.5 release not 9.4.
>
> However, 9.5 is out, and my understanding is that released NEWS sections
> should not be substantially modified in most cases
> (<https://list.orgmode.org/87o8ez4sch.fsf@bzg.fr>). I'll leave it to
> the author of the original change and Bastien to decide if they want to
> make an exception in this case.
I also agree it should have had a NEWS entry (something I never
remember), but don't have much of an opinion on whether that entry gets
added after the fact or not!
Eric Abrahamsen <eric@ericabrahamsen.net> writes:
> Kyle Meyer <kyle@kyleam.com> writes:
>
>> Michael Brand writes:
>>
>>> The change is not announced in ORG-NEWS. I think it should be in Version 9.4.
>>
>> Right, I agree this change should have come with a NEWS entry, though
>> 0c4e844c8 (Remove default binding for org-table-blank-field, 2021-04-28)
>> is from the 9.5 release not 9.4.
>>
>> However, 9.5 is out, and my understanding is that released NEWS sections
>> should not be substantially modified in most cases
>> (<https://list.orgmode.org/87o8ez4sch.fsf@bzg.fr>). I'll leave it to
>> the author of the original change and Bastien to decide if they want to
>> make an exception in this case.
>
> I also agree it should have had a NEWS entry (something I never
> remember), but don't have much of an opinion on whether that entry gets
> added after the fact or not!
I agree an entry should have been added in the 9.5 news file. However,
I'm not sure it is a good idea to add one now given that 9.5 has been
released.
The problem with adding one now is that it means 9.5 will have 2
different news files. This could cause confusion as some people will
have a news file which includes the details and some will not. If people
are willing to accept that possible bit of confusion, I would add the
entry, otherwise, leave it and add it to the 9.6 news file (so that at
least the change was documented/tracked, albeit after the fact.
Hi all Then Version 9.6 (or forget) seems right to me. Michael
Hi Eric, Eric Abrahamsen <eric@ericabrahamsen.net> writes: > I also agree it should have had a NEWS entry (something I never > remember) I added a note about this on https://orgmode.org/worg/org-contribute.html Thanks, -- Bastien
Hi Kyle,
thanks for the heads up!
Kyle Meyer <kyle@kyleam.com> writes:
> Right, I agree this change should have come with a NEWS entry, though
> 0c4e844c8 (Remove default binding for org-table-blank-field, 2021-04-28)
> is from the 9.5 release not 9.4.
>
> However, 9.5 is out, and my understanding is that released NEWS sections
> should not be substantially modified in most cases
> (<https://list.orgmode.org/87o8ez4sch.fsf@bzg.fr>). I'll leave it to
> the author of the original change and Bastien to decide if they want to
> make an exception in this case.
I suggest we add a news entry in etc/ORG-NEWS in the bugfix branch for
the change to be advertized for 9.5.x users.
Can anyone do that?
--
Bastien
Bastien Guerry writes:
> I suggest we add a news entry in etc/ORG-NEWS in the bugfix branch for
> the change to be advertized for 9.5.x users.
>
> Can anyone do that?
Done in 9bc3a2b98.
Kyle Meyer <kyle@kyleam.com> writes:
> Done in 9bc3a2b98.
Thanks a lot,
--
Bastien