From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id qDVNJVs39GVHBAEAqHPOHw:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 12:56:11 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0.migadu.com with LMTPS id qDVNJVs39GVHBAEAqHPOHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 12:56:11 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=oo8poSSa; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1710503771; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=7Jw68DhSWUxr5o/mnThGaeV2piE9OgOjkQjww0onerE=; b=rShPzEvYv78VlaCV4o2wxrJves1NzJAT9eHOdvrfkDIfypIOBkiGHZRrCHcQ0QGWLhFOPj /irVt+mtKIwhxPeKUsX1GYuNhOo1VZ8uvd2zRSc02aZihuB1zFyVdUPgi4EgTJfvmhXpNk MuznzMbLl1NuA+QKKU22D4rsrI7sPXUojPsoBPmmTz7fiNPdufl2w8BB2Et4sJucwKq4EE qiniQbsgDwFp1uXKIuSOVMFgB1ygGlZ4aYh0sq2sye3+9W2RcpdVDhGMf8CZUqxgz8W3P3 /XnXbh27gTNjyeSIbbtl1Q7FKCuuq8Fb4284Yd9VihSKCaVTNdT1vxtQ0lcYwA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1710503771; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Zg7VkEn/Z5f5+bGeFkycKOmBBOPGs6V8vXNHzsRmsDwo1dYJSGY+5aF4VtX21fAI2G0R5n C4wwCbX6JSsYJWPlH6InNkKJB+KiZ0a3NRHU86I2bUZ1mrC0HRaWZQl/Kbh7BwkIHw/q38 KXUpJgBTD5QooGGUFzuPqOz0xFHcOA95+8aBHbPK0Of1RnyX+ScehCNrWDfpgOdAxkl1DW 1dpHraYxqC04IJq8507767dhw24V/zP/W7CegvlJBOwUaI4ZaMi7VVykgMaeHmR49715Du /TDUKEISV60YeB4fY0ER+L13fUMNFdZHVNdY9dAhaBQ3FAQVsSvAnyengxoQ3Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=oo8poSSa; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51F0558FD8 for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 12:56:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rl5bo-0003u1-I7; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 07:20:22 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rl5bl-0003td-Vw for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 07:20:18 -0400 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rl5bd-0008AK-IY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 07:20:17 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25EDC240027 for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 12:20:06 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1710501606; bh=nGjh6tPWowfQRDkyGeCmhBAMjDbddDPWcwUDPHMeWXY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: From; b=oo8poSSaJIjQTdZidA0qccCfBpZ+0zQC4TnNUTqhmPhYJKVDuCMAREyujgbIjVmZT McP+5VMeyo7R3XSLKGCJ6lsmRZocHRYqJ5DqdjUIdHI7G9WMmaYs1Tfha9YQukI5st NkhqbjU9DuE3hE0YrDUifi5RQAnl/HNuaxkC+ScoQsO+ZfQtCKDK2CELZm2v0EgdFU /5BgWYQuFiF2uVGN+b8CuLJw1Lbw4uaO7WInypiSZzl+0Qs/tv1txAyBW3KNfSENhR tooC4HGlfgRBHjdMMBfdNosPy3447xuJKQd/y32IkJwJHnHhcVCKE4tNGp64CNm3jH Ob3D31zeWSSoQ== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4Tx1xd2RVVz9rxL; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 12:20:05 +0100 (CET) From: Ihor Radchenko To: Max Nikulin Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Subject: Re: `:export' attribute?: Re: Experimental public branch for inline special blocks In-Reply-To: References: <87wmql6690.fsf@posteo.net> <87cysb2h68.fsf@posteo.net> <877ciavnwo.fsf_-_@posteo.net> <87bk7k7tuf.fsf@posteo.net> <87wmq85xn9.fsf@posteo.net> <877ci7bm2b.fsf@posteo.net> <87y1an9wkj.fsf@posteo.net> <87il1qm61y.fsf@posteo.net> <87edcem4rw.fsf@posteo.net> <87wmq4me2k.fsf@posteo.net> <87plvvioh3.fsf@localhost> Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 14:19:46 +0000 Message-ID: <87cyrvinlp.fsf@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.04 X-Spam-Score: -1.04 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 51F0558FD8 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx11.migadu.com X-TUID: UEx3brzMlIz4 Max Nikulin writes: >> I am not following this branch of the discussion closely, but what about >> not inviting a new DSL here and instead using Elisp sexps here? >> Something like (latex body) (html none) ((not (or latex html)) contents) > > I do not mind in general. Just a couple of questions: > - How to specify whether the rule should be applied to derived backends? > - Is there a ready to use function that can interpret such expressions? Good question. I guess that what I propose is still a new DSL at the end... Oh well. I guess that the closest existing DSL would be what `buffer-match-p' function uses. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at