From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Orgmodeorg-export-generic gives an error Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 09:11:00 +0200 Message-ID: <87bpnb98mz.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87eisgjl8s.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <211769420907171223r6ffe0086mccfbed65aa0fe3f5@mail.gmail.com> <877hy137vz.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MTsSR-0002jI-P8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 03:11:15 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MTsSO-0002e5-2R for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 03:11:15 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=59817 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MTsSN-0002dt-OK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 03:11:11 -0400 Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:20465) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MTsSN-0001CL-B3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 03:11:11 -0400 Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.198.243]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MTsSM-0003uw-Mt for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 03:11:10 -0400 Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id f25so300246rvb.6 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 00:11:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Wes Hardaker's message of "Wed, 22 Jul 2009 08:13:53 -0700") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Wes Hardaker Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Shelagh Manton Wes Hardaker writes: >>>>>> On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 01:59:12 +0200, Bastien said: > > B> Those two functions come from alist.el which is included in Apel: > > So does that mean it's safe to leave the functions in use within > org-export generic, AFAIK `set-alist' is not defined in vanilla Emacs. So no, it's not safe to leave this function in use in org-export-generic.el. > or should I replace it with a locally defined > slightly-different-named version? Either do that or advertize the need for the Apel package, or integrate what set-alist does without even creating a function. Up to you :) -- Bastien