From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Mead Subject: Re: Vertical split in Emacs 23 Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 11:36:51 +0100 Message-ID: <87bpn791do.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87tz1dsulc.fsf@gmail.com> <87vdltom3d.fsf@in-ulm.de> <87skgxf5wz.fsf@gmail.com> <87bpnkl1j8.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MV16g-0002KO-P6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 06:37:30 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MV16a-0002It-Tf for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 06:37:28 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52587 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MV16Y-0002Ig-I1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 06:37:23 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:51113 helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MV16Y-00026G-3w for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 06:37:22 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1MV16U-0006Wf-OY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 10:37:18 +0000 Received: from cpc3-rdng14-0-0-cust786.winn.cable.ntl.com ([82.0.211.19]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 10:37:18 +0000 Received: from paul.d.mead by cpc3-rdng14-0-0-cust786.winn.cable.ntl.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 10:37:18 +0000 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Bastien writes: > Hi Paul, > > Paul Mead writes: > >> Having thought about this a bit more, I can see where the new behaviour >> might be useful, but it just looks a bit ugly in org-mode because (I >> guess) it's not been written to deal with narrower buffers. > > can you provide a screenshot showing a case where org-mode looks ugly > with Emacs default split behavior? Then I might have a look... > > Thanks! OK, so I've had a chance to look at this again, and my main concern was with the width of the TODO state quick-select buffer. Now I see that the length of the line is dependent on my configuration, so that if I shorten the todo sequence lines in .emacs it looks far better in the narrow window. The only remaining issue is with the agenda view, where my longish TODO items are truncated in the window, so I either need to use follow mode or see if one of the wrapping functions will work on this buffer. Thanks Paul