From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastian Rose Subject: Re: BUG: org-annotation-helper.el uses caddr without requiring cl Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 23:28:08 +0100 Message-ID: <87bpjb72pz.fsf@gmx.de> References: <20091109130727.GG29752@atlantic.linksys.moosehall> <12966.1257780233@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> <87r5s776bu.fsf@gmx.de> <425CD935-9BD5-42B9-AF92-60ED7821D5FA@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N7cio-000221-D6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:28:26 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N7cij-0001xt-Ao for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:28:26 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42085 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N7cij-0001xM-28 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:28:21 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:45079) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N7cii-000595-5z for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:28:20 -0500 In-Reply-To: <425CD935-9BD5-42B9-AF92-60ED7821D5FA@gmail.com> (Carsten Dominik's message of "Mon, 9 Nov 2009 22:34:21 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: org-mode mailing list Carsten Dominik writes: >>> Isn't org-annotation-helper.el obsolete? I thought org-protocol.el has >>> supplanted it completely, in which case it might be better to just >>> delete it from the tree, instead of fixing it (or perhaps move it >>> to a deprecated area) - that would also help in not confusing new >>> users. >> >> >> Yes, if everyone is OK with that removal. The functionality of >> org-annotation-helper is re-implemented in >> org-protocol. org-annotation-helper.el was one of the parents >> actually. Some code is still in there. That's why it's authors are >> mentioned their, too. >> >> Anyway, org-annotation-helper.el might still be in use somewhere. > > I have no objection to remove it, if the author agrees. > Can anyone try to figure that out? Yes, I will do that. How about org-browser-url.el then? It's in org-protocol.el, too. All authors of the too files are mentioned in org-protocol.el. Sebastian