From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Sebastian Rose <sebastian_rose@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: Re: [Patch] New implementation of the Org remember process ready
 for comments and testing
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 14:49:08 +0200
Message-ID: <87bpb1hq2j.fsf@gmx.de>
References: <C46F10DC-DE51-43D4-AFFE-F71E440D1E1F@gmail.com>
	<871vbz9mjm.fsf@gmx.de> <zf.upnwrtqdr69.fsf@zeitform.de>
	<87wrtqghy7.fsf@gmx.de> <zf.upnk4pqdjmj.fsf@zeitform.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44360 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ORPO6-0005A5-PX
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 08:49:07 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <sebastian_rose@gmx.de>) id 1ORPO5-0000Mc-Fu
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 08:49:06 -0400
Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:55234)
	by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <sebastian_rose@gmx.de>) id 1ORPO5-0000Lw-41
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 08:49:05 -0400
In-Reply-To: <zf.upnk4pqdjmj.fsf@zeitform.de> (Ulf Stegemann's message of
	"Wed, 23 Jun 2010 14:21:56 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Ulf Stegemann <ulf-news@zeitform.de>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Ulf Stegemann <ulf-news@zeitform.de> writes:
> Do you need some more information? Should I do some further testing?
>
> Ulf

Errr - No. Thanks for testing. I tried again and found, that those
values are not present (only the link). Sorry for the inconvenience. 

I guess you read Carstens answer, too.

  Sebastian