From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Sebastian Rose <sebastian_rose@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: Re: Publishing bug: FOOTNOTE DEFINITION NOT FOUND: 0
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 18:44:46 +0200
Message-ID: <87bp6sn4zl.fsf@gmx.de>
References: <m2d3r8lvj9.fsf@tyche.lnouv.com> <m28w1wlr0v.fsf@tyche.lnouv.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=47623 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P7WLx-0008Rx-E0
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 12:44:58 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <sebastian_rose@gmx.de>) id 1P7WLv-0001ok-VI
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 12:44:57 -0400
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:42262 helo=mail.gmx.net)
	by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <sebastian_rose@gmx.de>) id 1P7WLv-0001o2-JZ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 12:44:55 -0400
In-Reply-To: <m28w1wlr0v.fsf@tyche.lnouv.com> (Erik L. Arneson's message of
	"Sun, 17 Oct 2010 10:31:44 -0600")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: "Erik L. Arneson" <dybbuk@lnouv.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

"Erik L. Arneson" <dybbuk@lnouv.com> writes:
> On Sun, 17 Oct 2010, Erik L. Arneson wrote:
>> I'm running into a very strange bug when publishing to HTML.  Even when
>> a page contains no footnotes, a footnote section is added with one
>> footnote an the text "FOOTNOTE DEFINITION NOT FOUND: 0".
>
> I am, by the way, running the latest 7.01trans from Git.  I just now did
> an update and this strange footnote behavior is still happening.


Do you have a `[0]' somewhere in your text?

I just found, that that footnote section is generated for this piece of
text.


Work-around:  ~[0]~



HTH

  Sebastian