From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bernt Hansen <bernt@norang.ca>
Subject: Re: Bug: Cloning tasks deletes clock time in the original [7.7
 (release_7.7-571-gf558105)]
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2011 22:57:29 -0500
Message-ID: <87boryfc9i.fsf@norang.ca>
References: <87zkfrfrjf.fsf@norang.ca> <87vcqa607a.wl%dmaus@ictsoc.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:49549)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bernt@norang.ca>) id 1RUVs0-0004vl-5K
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 22:57:37 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bernt@norang.ca>) id 1RUVrz-00019Y-2D
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 22:57:36 -0500
Received: from mho-03-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.66]:36145
	helo=mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bernt@norang.ca>) id 1RUVry-00019S-Vm
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 22:57:35 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87vcqa607a.wl%dmaus@ictsoc.de> (David Maus's message of "Wed, 23
	Nov 2011 21:41:29 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: David Maus <dmaus@ictsoc.de>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

David Maus <dmaus@ictsoc.de> writes:

> At Sat, 19 Nov 2011 21:37:08 -0500,
> Bernt Hansen wrote:
>>
>> I have the entries I want but my original clock lines have been deleted.
>> I would expect this behaviour for the newly created clones only - not
>> the original entry.
>
> Pushed a fix for this problem. Could you check it works out for you?
>

Hi David,

This works for me.  Thanks!

Regards,
Bernt