From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: pinard@iro.umontreal.ca (=?utf-8?Q?Fran=C3=A7ois?= Pinard) Subject: Re: The reportmode report does not count the running clock Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 10:08:38 -0500 Message-ID: <87boqjtsi1.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca> References: <87liqhrt6r.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca> <87pqfsituv.fsf@norang.ca> <87r508d00p.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca> <87hb14ij4h.fsf@norang.ca> <3CF43367-3C9C-4509-8383-90A26C016D2A@gmail.com> <87mxa4u6oe.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca> <878vlont7e.fsf@altern.org> <8739bwuoo8.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca> <8762gr93m5.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:55121) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RiSSN-0003jo-GL for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 10:08:52 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RiSSF-0002Su-QN for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 10:08:47 -0500 Received: from 206-248-137-202.dsl.teksavvy.com ([206.248.137.202]:64350 helo=mercure.epsilon-ti.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RiSSF-0002Sg-MZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 10:08:39 -0500 In-Reply-To: <8762gr93m5.fsf@gnu.org> (Bastien's message of "Wed, 04 Jan 2012 11:14:10 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: Bernt Hansen , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Carsten Dominik Bastien writes: > Hi Fran=C3=A7ois, Hi, Bastien, and everybody. (By the way, in "Carsten Dominik", may I assume that "Carsten" is the first name and "Dominik" the family name? What is the nationality?) > That's why I tried to gather *all* functions and variables in an .org > file, which you can see as an appendix. Did you check it? Not yet, I'll come to it for sure. > Org should claim 10% of the time it spares you ;-) Absolutely. This is why I initially got involved in GNU, long ago. It was absolutely normal to me that I repay the Emacs (and GCC, and Make, and Bison) author for all the increased productivity and saved time. (I honestly think I amply filled my debt, so I'm comfortable.) By the way, long ago, I signed a generic FSF document for all past, present and future work for any free software project related to GNU. Hopefully, it is still valid and I am free from any later paperwork. (Yet, Richard may decide strange things once in a while.) > My suggestion is to stick to the current collective workflow: let's > try to document small things in relevant places (manual or worg) and > let's avoid Big Projects (bikesheds). I will not tackle big Org projects unless I really think I'll have enough free time to finish them :-). Fran=C3=A7ois