From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steinar Bang Subject: Re: Minimal overhead Org-mode blogging system Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 23:15:16 +0100 Message-ID: <87bopz5ogb.fsf@dod.no> References: <2011-12-04T17-22-10@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> <2011-12-08T01-25-36@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> <2011-12-08T15-13-31@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> <87pqek6dop.fsf@dod.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:49217) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ro0Gg-0004m6-PI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:15:39 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ro0Gf-00085t-Ld for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:15:38 -0500 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:38121) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ro0Gf-00085j-Cw for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:15:37 -0500 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ro0Gd-00033K-Rf for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 23:15:35 +0100 Received: from cm-84.208.231.161.getinternet.no ([84.208.231.161]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 23:15:35 +0100 Received: from sb by cm-84.208.231.161.getinternet.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 23:15:35 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org >>>>> Puneeth Chaganti : > This is totally home brew stuff. Well, thank you for sharing this home brew stuff. I've been trying to use the other org based blog solutions, but they have all failed for some reason or other, and they have also seemed abandoned. > Sorry for the trouble you are having, in getting it to run. No worries! :-) > Try commenting out the lines 257, 258 in reprise.py and see if that > works for you. I'll take a look later, and try to see if this can be > improved. Yep, commenting out the tag cloud generation made the reprise.py script run witout failing. Thanks!