From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [ANN] ASCII back-end for new export engine Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:58:26 +0100 Message-ID: <87bopps3nx.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87pqec4xua.fsf@gmail.com> <87obtvk6j0.fsf@gmail.com> <87obtrel2z.fsf@gmail.com> <8739b2sctn.fsf@gmail.com> <87y5suqprx.fsf@gmail.com> <87ty3iuw4b.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:58378) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqlPt-0006Sk-EI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 08:00:40 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqlPr-0008HH-5f for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 08:00:33 -0500 Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:37079) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqlPq-0008Gn-NO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 08:00:30 -0500 Received: by wera13 with SMTP id a13so1499747wer.0 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 05:00:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87ty3iuw4b.fsf@Rainer.invalid> (Achim Gratz's message of "Thu, 26 Jan 2012 20:00:52 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Achim Gratz Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Achim Gratz writes: > Nicolas Goaziou writes: >> But it's still new syntax. It could also be narrowed >> to :LATEX_NUMBERING: nil, but I think that this feature, if implemented, >> should be available for every major back-end, much like "num:1". > > Unless I miss something, if "num:*" would be allowed in addition to > integers, the LaTeX crowd would be pleased, no terribly new syntax would > be needed and all other backends could take note to skip numbering that > headline. Maybe one could throw in "nil" and "none" as an alias for > "*". I don't understand. What would "num:*" achieve? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou