From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: William =?UTF-8?B?TMOJQ0hFTExF?= Subject: Re: Cannot use #+call correctly with babel Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 14:42:00 -0400 Message-ID: <87bokhu6fb.wl%william.lechelle@ens-lyon.fr> References: <4FDCB4F9.80404@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46354) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SgKQO-0004Bq-5I for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 14:42:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SgKQM-0002DH-Ef for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 14:42:11 -0400 Received: from jabiru.ens-lyon.fr ([140.77.51.2]:46884) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SgKQM-0002Cp-8B for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 14:42:10 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jabiru.ens-lyon.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id BADE51EB21E for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 20:42:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from jabiru.ens-lyon.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (jabiru.ens-lyon.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M12PPH2Q3+w8 for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 20:42:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from villian.umontreal.ca (ip-96-43-232-62.dsl.netrevolution.com [96.43.232.62]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by jabiru.ens-lyon.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9F4E31EB2BF for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 20:42:06 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <4FDCB4F9.80404@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org At Sat, 16 Jun 2012 18:31:53 +0200, Benoit Bayol wrote: > > All the mixes on headers I tried have been failures. > > Here is my example source : http://pastebin.com/63uHDvZH > > Does anyone see why I cannot have the output of the code and the results > in the last sections ? Hi Benoit, I may be wrong, but I ran into problems with #+call-s and header positions also recently, and most of it was solved when I understood the manual > #+CALL: () required the empty parenthesis() even if no argument were provided. I now use : #+CALL: name-of-block[:results output]() :results replace So maybe you lack parenthesis (or maybe I misunderstood it), and maybe you should try to put your headers in , after the parenthesis. HTH,