From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tassilo Horn Subject: Re: Bug: #+STARTUP: overview and org-startup-folded have no effect [7.9.3e (7.9.3e-1032-g791a8d @ /home/horn/Repos/el/org-mode/lisp/)] Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 19:42:20 +0100 Message-ID: <87bobmzqib.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> References: <87mwv7i7on.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <86ehgjcl98.fsf@somewhere.org> <87pq03fdul.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52366) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U63la-0003RT-JW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 13:42:44 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U63lV-0007sY-UA for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 13:42:42 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:35989) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U63lV-0007sS-Nc for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 13:42:37 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U63lk-0003om-Lr for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 19:42:52 +0100 Received: from 91-67-10-84-dynip.superkabel.de ([91.67.10.84]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 19:42:52 +0100 Received: from tsdh by 91-67-10-84-dynip.superkabel.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 19:42:52 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Bastien writes: Hi Bastien, >> It's an optimization done by Bastien. > > I think it's fine to have this by default, the time spared is worth it > IMHO. But I understand many people may want to turn this off. > >> There is a variable to inhibit it. > > (setq org-agenda-inhibit-startup nil) > > If you don't want the optimization. I've done the performance measurements you've requested in Message-ID: <87ehgjgmiv.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de>. For me, the "optimized" version is by no means faster than the `org-agenda-inhibit-startup' set to nil. If you reproduce the measurements on your machine and it turns out that you get results inverse to mine, I'm happy to help debugging where the differences come from. > In general, it's worth sticking to the default behavior if you have > many agenda files. If you have only a few, the setting above may be > preferable. My measurements were performed with my 7 normal agenda files + one synthetically constructed. 1 top-level headline with 8000 child TODO items, and then triggering the TODO agenda (and also the week agenda). That's what you've requested in <87vc9vdwx7.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>. Bye, Tassilo