From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: New exporter and dates in tables Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 15:16:54 +0200 Message-ID: <87bo9mh6ex.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87fvz1opiz.fsf@norang.ca> <8761zxwlvn.fsf@gmail.com> <87bo9pntym.fsf@norang.ca> <0604BF00-1FE8-4EAA-A346-C125A5127CAD@gmail.com> <877gkcvm3n.fsf@gmail.com> <173ADFE7-A1FB-4ECB-A78A-C99662A8030F@gmail.com> <87fvyysghk.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54142) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UPutY-0004vG-9Y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 09:17:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UPutT-0002QF-5a for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 09:17:00 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-x22d.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::22d]:64988) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UPutS-0002PS-TV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 09:16:55 -0400 Received: by mail-we0-f173.google.com with SMTP id t57so348165wey.32 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 06:16:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87fvyysghk.fsf@gmail.com> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Wed, 10 Apr 2013 14:43:51 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: Bernt Hansen , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Carsten Dominik Hi all, Note that Org 8.0-pre comes with a new export option `org-export-with-planning' which handles the export of SCHEDULED / DEADLINE / CLOSED time-stamps. This used to be the job of org-export-with-timestamps. I guess many people who used (setq org-export-with-timestamps nil) now want (setq org-export-with-planning nil) and which works well with (setq org-export-with-timestamps 'inactive). So I'm wondering: would the setup above spare us with this exception? I know people sometimes throw inactive time-stamps, but those small indications would better fit in a commented line. WDYT? Best, -- Bastien