From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bill White <billw@wolfram.com>
Subject: Re: disable tangling for an entire section?
Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 10:51:51 -0500
Message-ID: <87bo8e5148.fsf@wolfram.com>
References: <87haifz6hb.fsf@wolfram.com> <m2ip2vdzxh.fsf@uio.no>
	<8638tzvuzy.fsf@somewhere.org> <87r4hhv22i.fsf@wolfram.com>
	<m2sj1wzluc.fsf@uio.no> <87txm7mgpn.fsf@krugs.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54414)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <billw@wolfram.com>) id 1Ubv2b-0006hq-Vo
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 13 May 2013 11:52:01 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <billw@wolfram.com>) id 1Ubv2Y-0001mR-H1
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 13 May 2013 11:51:57 -0400
Received: from relay.wolfram.com ([140.177.205.37]:50690
	helo=relay-int.wolfram.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <billw@wolfram.com>) id 1Ubv2Y-0001mC-BN
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 13 May 2013 11:51:54 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87txm7mgpn.fsf@krugs.de> (Rainer M. Krug's message of "Mon, 13
	May 2013 10:23:00 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: "Rainer M. Krug" <Rainer@krugs.de>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Christian Moe <mail@christianmoe.com>

On Mon May 13 2013 at 03:23, Rainer@krugs.de (Rainer M. Krug) wrote:

> Christian Moe <mail@christianmoe.com> writes:
>
>>> I was hoping that a higher-level setting would override all tangle
>>> settings under it, no matter what they might be.  This would make it
>>> possible to change an entire section's tangling without fussing with
>>> each code block's setting.
>>
>> The status quo makes more sense, I think. It allows you to easily change
>> an entire section's tangling but make specific exceptions that
>> override the general setting.
>
> I agree with Christian here. But you could trick org into achieving
> what you want, in specifying a tangle target in the PROPERTIES sectio,
> given that you only use :tangle yes :

I wish I'd thought of that!  Many thanks -

bw