From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: Minor problems with dvipng latex image preview Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 11:25:37 -0400 Message-ID: <87bo7sfq1a.fsf@pierrot.dokosmarshall.org> References: <871u9238sl.fsf@pierrot.dokosmarshall.org> <87ehcyg7mg.fsf@gmail.com> <877giq1aj1.fsf@pierrot.dokosmarshall.org> <87d2shrfwj.fsf@gmail.com> <87y5b5znnu.fsf@pierrot.dokosmarshall.org> <87wqqptz7k.fsf@gmail.com> <87txltz8c3.fsf@pierrot.dokosmarshall.org> <877gim6cc7.fsf@gmail.com> <87sj1amej5.fsf@pierrot.dokosmarshall.org> <877gigfqnt.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38389) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ui4jo-0006WD-76 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 30 May 2013 11:26:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ui4je-0002F1-Lm for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 30 May 2013 11:26:00 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:40058) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ui4je-0002ES-Dy for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 30 May 2013 11:25:50 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ui4jc-0007dF-Hm for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 30 May 2013 17:25:48 +0200 Received: from pool-108-7-96-134.bstnma.fios.verizon.net ([108.7.96.134]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 30 May 2013 17:25:48 +0200 Received: from ndokos by pool-108-7-96-134.bstnma.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 30 May 2013 17:25:48 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: >> But it is two implementations where one would suffice (Windows might >> present problems however: I don't know the availability of >> dvipng/imagemagick on that platform - I believe they are both >> available on MacOS, but I could be wrong). > > What about asking, in a fresh thread, the users about it, then? FWIW, > I'm all for anything related to spring cleaning. > OK, will do. > So be it. Tell me when the worg page is ready, I'll update the docstring > accordingly. > OK, will do. > Improvements to the debug system need to be discussed thoroughly in > order to set up complete specifications (I don't think it's just about > latex snippets). > > This cannot happen as a side note in a thread between you and me. If you > think it is important enough, please initiate the process in a new > thread. OK, will do. Thanks! -- Nick (AKA "broken record")