From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions? Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 01:39:35 +0100 Message-ID: <87bnyucng8.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87ob33nnwi.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87eh3yvgyg.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <3bc3c5a1-1c3f-4975-9dd6-3428aabb69be@default> <87ppniu06o.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <1c11f795-ca4a-45bf-9701-7645a0609ed1@default> <87lhy6l4k4.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87d2jh93jb.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87bnywtqx4.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <86lhxz6uw8.fsf@somewhere.org> <87a9eefzmw.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37698) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W8ffp-0003UF-1d for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 19:40:12 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W8ffh-0004PS-TM for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 19:40:04 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:46327) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W8ffh-0004P7-Lz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 19:39:57 -0500 Received: from public by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W8ffg-0004Ro-6g for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 01:39:56 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Thomas S. Dye's message of "Wed, 29 Jan 2014 09:48:20 -1000") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: "Thomas S. Dye" Cc: public-emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@plane.gmane.org, Sebastien Vauban tsd@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes: > Then "punctuation" has two senses, one generic and another specific. To > my mind, the emacs guideline is ambiguous unless there is some > convention about which sense is meant in this case. I guess it would be > possible to look at the code to figure this out, but I'm not well > equipped to do that. Re-reading the Elisp conventions about keybindings says this: • Sequences consisting of ‘C-c’ followed by ‘{’, ‘}’, ‘<’, ‘>’, ‘:’ or ‘;’ are also reserved for major modes. • Sequences consisting of ‘C-c’ followed by any other punctuation character are allocated for minor modes. Using them in a major mode is not absolutely prohibited, but if you do that, the major mode binding may be shadowed from time to time by minor modes. So C-c { and C-c } are fine in a major mode. (And now that C-c : is not used anymore, this gives us one more free keybinding to reuse.) -- Bastien