From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Yasushi SHOJI <yashi@atmark-techno.com>
Subject: Re: parser: verbatim or code?
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 13:19:12 +0900
Message-ID: <87bny5catb.wl@dns1.atmark-techno.com>
References: <87iosg1oge.wl@dns1.atmark-techno.com> <87mwhsfo9e.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87ob27tp8p.wl@dns1.atmark-techno.com> <87eh33s9ag.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58542)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Yasushi.SHOJI@atmark-techno.com>) id 1WFc9V-0001HF-26
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 23:19:31 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Yasushi.SHOJI@atmark-techno.com>) id 1WFc9L-00081C-Cc
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 23:19:24 -0500
Received: from p654782.hkidff01.ap.so-net.ne.jp ([121.101.71.130]:54988
	helo=dns1.atmark-techno.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Yasushi.SHOJI@atmark-techno.com>) id 1WFc9L-00080h-2L
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 23:19:15 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87eh33s9ag.fsf@gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: n.goaziou@gmail.com
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi Nicolas,

At Sun, 16 Feb 2014 10:20:55 +0100,
Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> 
> If we do change them, it should only happen in "org-element.el". I don't
> think that would break existing documents, as code and verbatim are
> really close to each other.
> 
> I don't care either way. Though, I lean towards the first option, as
> I like "=" as verbatim (which may be the source of the initial
> confusion).

I'd suggest to keep documentation, and fix the code.

Because, our document serves our _user_ as the interface definition
and it's already been widely accepted.  Users expect to have marked up
code segment if they have =code= in their document.

;; It might be just me but I've been seen =code= in this mailing list
;; many times but never noticed ~code~, for example.
-- 
          yashi