From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thorsten Jolitz Subject: State-of-the-art in linking org items to places in source files? Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 09:37:57 +0200 Message-ID: <87bnqe3dey.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34902) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XU9on-0000bz-Os for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 03:38:33 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XU9oe-00071l-Ne for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 03:38:25 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:44019) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XU9oe-0006z6-II for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 03:38:16 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XU9oY-0001zw-DY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 09:38:10 +0200 Received: from e178060211.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.60.211]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 09:38:10 +0200 Received: from tjolitz by e178060211.adsl.alicedsl.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 09:38:10 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi List, I remember extensive discussions on this list of how to associate org-files and source files by links, but I don't find them anymore and I don't remember what is the State-of-the-art in this area. It was about 'outsourcing' comments&planning-info from a programming-mode file to an associated org-mode file and the ability to jump back and forth seamlessly between the two files (or rather between the right places in both files). Wasn't there even a library to support this kind of workflow? I would appreciate any hint that updates me on this topic. -- cheers, Thorsten