From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: [patch] better(?) indention for cdlatex-environment
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 02:10:26 +0100
Message-ID: <87bnkxti0t.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <87386e0zuy.fsf@gmx.us> <87wq3pwg29.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<87lhk48z9x.fsf@gmx.us> <87fvacw2jv.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<87mw4kyq2e.fsf@gmx.us> <87fva9tqdj.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<873869h0cd.fsf@gmx.us>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52656)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1YMREX-00021C-KQ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 20:09:22 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1YMREU-0002t2-Vh
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 20:09:21 -0500
Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::195]:34574)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1YMREU-0002rn-Pj
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 20:09:18 -0500
In-Reply-To: <873869h0cd.fsf@gmx.us> (rasmus@gmx.us's message of "Sat, 14 Feb
	2015 00:13:06 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us> writes:

> I insert a newline before I even call cdlatex.

If point moved _after calling cdlatex_ you know it worked. Otherwise,
you just remove the newline.

> I fail to see the relevant of your example.  I want to know why:
>
>    -i1
>  X -i2
>
> => C-j 
>
>    -i1
>
>       -i2
>
> I.e. i2 becomes a child of i1.

This was a bug, which is now fixed. Thanks.


Regards,