From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: problem with org-capture Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 10:02:05 +0100 Message-ID: <87bna7ucqa.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87d1uq7f6e.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87r3j5kdvu.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87zixtniiy.fsf@pinto.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk> <87fuzktugf.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <565F776C.7020507@verizon.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34432) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4PkT-00059T-JY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 04:00:22 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4PkO-0003nV-Q5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 04:00:21 -0500 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:49363) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4PkO-0003nA-L0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 04:00:16 -0500 In-Reply-To: <565F776C.7020507@verizon.net> (Charles Millar's message of "Wed, 02 Dec 2015 17:57:48 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Charles Millar Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Charles Millar writes: > I think it is still broken in another way > > my template for capturing time as I work on a files - > > ("s" "timeslip" table-line > (file "/mnt/Data/ActiveFiles/EmacsFiles/timeslips.org") > "\| %(org-read-date)\| %^{FileName} %i\| %^{Narrative} > %i\| %^{Time} %i\| %^{Expense} %i" > > Last week the prompt org-read-date would pull up the calendar first; > now the template jumps first to FileName, then Narrative,then Time, > then Expense, then back to org-read-date. Well, this one is to be expected. S-exp placeholders are evaluated only once. This currently happens at the end of the process because some users do %(do-stuff "%i") Here you want it to happen at the beginning of the process, which is not quite compatible with the behaviour above. I guess we could check if the S-exp contains any placeholder to decide if it should be evaluated at the beginning or the end of the process, but that somehow sounds cheesy. > After C-c C-c there is anywhere 5 to 20 second delay. I'm not sure this is related to the change. Could you use elp-intrument-package and post the details? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou