From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: template for writing Emacs manuals in Org Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 18:20:27 +0200 Message-ID: <87bn43xrqs.fsf@saiph.selenimh> References: <87eg955clk.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87wpmt7u5i.fsf@gmx.us> <87r3d1u5yn.fsf@saiph.selenimh> <87eg91ten0.fsf@saiph.selenimh> <87a8jou24u.fsf@saiph.selenimh> <87futgikda.fsf@alphaville.usersys.redhat.com> <87oa83afi5.fsf@gmx.us> <4BDEAAA9-55A2-4886-80E1-ECF273D4C7E1@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42465) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b34D9-0005R1-Hh for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2016 12:20:44 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b34D7-0005pF-M6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2016 12:20:38 -0400 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::196]:41641) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b34D7-0005p7-Eq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2016 12:20:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4BDEAAA9-55A2-4886-80E1-ECF273D4C7E1@gmail.com> (Jonathan Leech-Pepin's message of "Wed, 18 May 2016 10:56:02 -0400") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Jonathan Leech-Pepin Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Rasmus Hello, Jonathan Leech-Pepin writes: > I=E2=80=99m trying to remember why I didn=E2=80=99t implement indexes as = properties > (it may well have been because I simply didn=E2=80=99t consider it). Assu= ming > there=E2=80=99s nothing in the exporter to prevent converting properties = to > text after headlines it could work. Treat comma separated values as > separate entries. Index entries are not section wide. It doesn't sound right to attach them to properties drawers. Besides, the {{{cindex()}}} macro is not used anymore. There is the CINDEX keyword, which is slightly better. I guess we could use #+INDEX instead, but it would require to add an information specific to Texinfo (index type), which would probably defeat the simplicity of the solution. Regards, --=20 Nicolas Goaziou