From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: BUG: in beamer export non-beamer tags exported as part of header Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 23:02:44 +0200 Message-ID: <87bn3v88zv.fsf@gmx.us> References: <87r3cr8xpt.fsf@gmx.us> <87fut79ozi.fsf@saiph.selenimh> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56158) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b5JVl-0001TK-9g for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 May 2016 17:05:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b5JVh-0003oz-Gy for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 May 2016 17:05:08 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:33274) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b5JVh-0003ot-9y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 May 2016 17:05:05 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1b5JVe-0003QL-Qq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 May 2016 23:05:02 +0200 Received: from ip-178-203-233-73.hsi10.unitymediagroup.de ([178.203.233.73]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 23:05:02 +0200 Received: from rasmus by ip-178-203-233-73.hsi10.unitymediagroup.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 23:05:02 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > Rainer M Krug writes: > >> But in my document, I have >> >> #+SELECT_TAGS: export presentation >> >> in which case, I would have expected, that the tags defined here are not >> exported? > > It's arguably better. > > OTOH, it is easier to remove them with a filter (or globally with > tags:nil) than to add them back if we automatically delete them. So, > I tend to think we shouldn't remove them automatically. > > WDYT? FWIW I agree with not being clever here. It becomes a too convoluted definition of tags. Aside, I can’t think of single case where I would *export* tags (but that’s another story). -- When in doubt, do it!