From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [bug] timed repeater shows up in wrong place Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2016 12:46:53 +0100 Message-ID: <87bmwp9t5e.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <878tsqfhoo.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87h97bqor9.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <878tsnq7kl.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87k2bstlyg.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <874m2w0zyt.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87wpfqfrv5.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87r35xgon4.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87vav8fnes.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87r35wf47l.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87wpfgbpf3.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43931) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cEECy-0006rx-1c for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 06:46:53 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cEECx-0001A8-8t for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 06:46:52 -0500 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::196]:33657) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cEECx-00019l-2q for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 06:46:51 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Samuel Wales's message of "Sun, 4 Dec 2016 14:27:45 -0700") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Samuel Wales Cc: emacs-orgmode , cmena@pobox.com Hello, Samuel Wales writes: > the only feature that seems to be missing from 8 and 9maint that might > be needed in 9master is a list of strings for todo kw that should show > future repeats. thus you could say that NOTE does not show future > repeats, but NEXTREPEAT does. I thought about this, but `org-agenda-show-future-repeats' has three possible value, which complicates introducing TODO keywords. IOW, it would need to be an alist, with a catch-all key yet to be defined... I'd rather keep the variable simple and not implement it if there's no real need for the feature. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou