From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: RFC better Unicode support - Unicode Characters causing problems
 with TAGs etc.
Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2017 15:01:12 +0100
Message-ID: <87bmje8udz.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <CAArV04Mz=80pWqs8i4O97aG3xFp1=cJYp5heDniEONbe76_+DQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51004)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1eLrJ8-0007bS-Az
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 09:01:24 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1eLrJ4-00060T-Lh
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 09:01:18 -0500
Received: from relay2-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::194]:46177)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>)
	id 1eLrJ4-0005zP-G9
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 09:01:14 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CAArV04Mz=80pWqs8i4O97aG3xFp1=cJYp5heDniEONbe76_+DQ@mail.gmail.com>
	(Tim O'Callaghan's message of "Fri, 1 Dec 2017 09:40:44 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Tim O'Callaghan <tim.ocallaghan@gmail.com>
Cc: org-mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hello,

"Tim O'Callaghan" <tim.ocallaghan@gmail.com> writes:

> I have been experimenting with some Unicode symbols as part of my TODO and
> TAG definitions, to mixed results. I would like to propose that they are
> given first class support, especially in tags and priorities.

I think Unicode in TODO keywords and priority cookies is already
possible.

The regexp for tags is

  ":[[:alnum:]_@#%:]+:"

What would you suggest instead?

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou