From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Kyle Meyer <kyle@kyleam.com>
Subject: Re: Contribution of a :confirm-evaluate flag to src blocks
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2019 15:21:21 -0400
Message-ID: <87blxrdu8e.fsf@kyleam.com>
References: <CACoFLrOvXMRK4DqfxR6GyMLjowSC2b71=FCeioxjH=mMRUBvtg@mail.gmail.com>
 <87sgr4htkf.fsf@kyleam.com>
 <CACoFLrN3m9UL_jiSMFGrimctrKc6=JmKmNpZLO5c=7kxG5zffg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34323)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2)
 (envelope-from <kyle@kyleam.com>) id 1hoBy1-0008K3-Ri
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 15:21:26 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <kyle@kyleam.com>) id 1hoBy1-000565-1o
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 15:21:25 -0400
Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:52167)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <kyle@kyleam.com>) id 1hoBy0-00054u-OP
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 15:21:24 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CACoFLrN3m9UL_jiSMFGrimctrKc6=JmKmNpZLO5c=7kxG5zffg@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
 <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Mackenzie Bligh <mackenziebligh@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Mackenzie Bligh <mackenziebligh@gmail.com> writes:

> Do you have any suggestions for the name of such a value?

I tried to avoid being responsible for a poorly chosen name :]

"'yes' or 'always'" pairs well with the existing "'no' or 'never'", but
I suppose that risks users not realizing that it implies not querying.
Perhaps 'eval-no-query', 'eval-without-query', or just 'without-query'?