From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: org-publish future ? Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 13:24:10 +0100 Message-ID: <87ac8lqjv9.fsf@tallis.ilo.ucl.ac.uk> References: <1839ad060606051303v6d94b45buf7923eebc95159a4@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fp2Vm-00030W-Cy for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 08:24:18 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fp2Vk-000304-N6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 08:24:18 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fp2Vk-000301-KT for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 08:24:16 -0400 Received: from [62.241.163.6] (helo=astro.systems.pipex.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Fp2e1-0007ll-9S for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 08:32:49 -0400 Received: from tallis.ilo.ucl.ac.uk (85-210-155-65.dsl.pipex.com [85.210.155.65]) by astro.systems.pipex.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74915E0000D1 for ; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 13:24:13 +0100 (BST) In-Reply-To: <1839ad060606051303v6d94b45buf7923eebc95159a4@mail.gmail.com> (Xavier Maillard's message of "Mon, 5 Jun 2006 22:03:26 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org "Xavier Maillard" writes: > I was looking on emacswiki searching for publish engines for > Emacs. Actually, I have found at least three of them: > > 1. muse > 2. emacs-wiki > 3. bhl Since you mentionned BHL, let me talk a bit about it. BHL is quite *old* and buggy - it was my first elisp attempt and it grew up into something too complicated. Additionnally, BHL support for the Wiki behavior is not as good as muse's one, so i would only recommand to use BHL for single document. And since BHL is a tool for *exporting* files (not publishing them), this wiki behavior isn't necessary anymore. In a (no so) near future, i plan to rewrite BHL so it concentrates on some functionnalities that are not muse priorities. For instance, i'd like BHL to implement a way of inserting readable bibtex references (working with reftex), indexes and footnotes. BHL should also remain a tool for creating human-readable files, excluding any form of explicit markup. -- Bastien