Hi, with this file: ------------------------------------ ***** blabla CLOCK: [2009-02-06 dv 09:39]--[2009-02-06 dv 10:12] => 0:33 <c:if test="<%= GroupPermission.contains(permissionChecker, group.getGroupId(), ActionKeys.MANAGE_LAYOUTS) %>"> ------------------------------------ I see this fragment: ------------------------------------ => 0:33 <c:if test= ------------------------------------ highlighted in face „org-code“. I think the => should not be interpreted as code markers (=these ones=). Change the colours to see it better while testing: (set-face-background 'org-code "#141") (set-face-foreground 'org-code "#1f1") (set-face-underline-p 'org-code nil) -- Daniel with org 6.20g
Hi Daniel, I cannot reproduce this here. Daniel Clemente <n142857@gmail.com> writes: > Hi, with this file: > > ------------------------------------ > ***** blabla > CLOCK: [2009-02-06 dv 09:39]--[2009-02-06 dv 10:12] => 0:33 > <c:if test="<%= GroupPermission.contains(permissionChecker, group.getGroupId(), ActionKeys.MANAGE_LAYOUTS) %>"> > ------------------------------------ > > I see this fragment: > ------------------------------------ > => 0:33 > <c:if test= > ------------------------------------ Is this the HTML source, or what you see in your browser, or both? Here the export works as expected (formatting adjusted for readability): <div id="outline-container-1" class="outline-2"> <h2 id="sec-1">1 blabla </h2> <div id="text-1"> <p> <span class="timestamp-kwd">CLOCK: </span> <span class="timestamp">2009-02-06 dv 09:39</span>– <span class="timestamp">2009-02-06 dv 10:12</span> <code>> 0:33 <c:if test</code>"<%= GroupPermission.contains(permissionChecker, group.getGroupId(), ActionKeys.MANAGE<sub>LAYOUTS</sub>) %>"> </p> </div> Regards, Sebastian > highlighted in face „org-code“. I think the => should not be interpreted as code markers (=these ones=). > > Change the colours to see it better while testing: > (set-face-background 'org-code "#141") > (set-face-foreground 'org-code "#1f1") > (set-face-underline-p 'org-code nil) > > > > -- Daniel with org 6.20g > > > > _______________________________________________ > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode > -- Sebastian Rose, EMMA STIL - mediendesign, Niemeyerstr.6, 30449 Hannover Tel.: +49 (0)511 - 36 58 472 Fax: +49 (0)1805 - 233633 - 11044 mobil: +49 (0)173 - 83 93 417 Email: s.rose@emma-stil.de, sebastian_rose@gmx.de Http: www.emma-stil.de
Hi Daniel,
stuff you do not want interpreted should be protected as
an example, or with ": " at the beginning of the line.
If you do want this interpreted as HTML, put it into a BEGIN_HTML
block or so.
- Carsten
On Feb 7, 2009, at 1:23 AM, Daniel Clemente wrote:
>
> Hi, with this file:
>
> ------------------------------------
> ***** blabla
> CLOCK: [2009-02-06 dv 09:39]--[2009-02-06 dv 10:12] => 0:33
> <c:if test="<%= GroupPermission.contains(permissionChecker,
> group.getGroupId(), ActionKeys.MANAGE_LAYOUTS) %>">
> ------------------------------------
>
> I see this fragment:
> ------------------------------------
> => 0:33
> <c:if test=
> ------------------------------------
> highlighted in face „org-code“. I think the => should not be
> interpreted as code markers (=these ones=).
>
> Change the colours to see it better while testing:
> (set-face-background 'org-code "#141")
> (set-face-foreground 'org-code "#1f1")
> (set-face-underline-p 'org-code nil)
>
>
>
> -- Daniel with org 6.20g
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
> I cannot reproduce this here.
You may need to close the file and open it again.
Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl> writes:
> stuff you do not want interpreted should be protected as
> an example, or with ": " at the beginning of the line.
> If you do want this interpreted as HTML, put it into a BEGIN_HTML block or so.
>
However, I think that the => of the clock should always be protected.
I also see it strange that it only happens if a double quote is present:
----------------------
***** the bug happens with this one
CLOCK: [2009-02-06 dv 09:39]--[2009-02-06 dv 10:12] => 0:33
a="b
***** doesn't happen (no highlight)
CLOCK: [2009-02-06 dv 09:39]--[2009-02-06 dv 10:12] => 0:33
a=b
----------------------
It's not so strange to write =" in an entry
-- Daniel
On Feb 7, 2009, at 11:32 AM, Daniel Clemente wrote: > Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl> writes: > >> stuff you do not want interpreted should be protected as >> an example, or with ": " at the beginning of the line. >> If you do want this interpreted as HTML, put it into a BEGIN_HTML >> block or so. >> > > However, I think that the => of the clock should always be protected. Yes, you are right here. Fixed, thanks. - Carsten > > > I also see it strange that it only happens if a double quote is > present: > > ---------------------- > ***** the bug happens with this one > CLOCK: [2009-02-06 dv 09:39]--[2009-02-06 dv 10:12] => 0:33 > a="b > > > ***** doesn't happen (no highlight) > CLOCK: [2009-02-06 dv 09:39]--[2009-02-06 dv 10:12] => 0:33 > a=b > > ---------------------- > > It's not so strange to write =" in an entry > > > -- Daniel